Computational Maps in the Visual Cortex
     Figure 10.9
MiikkulainenBednarChoeSirosh
Home    
About the Authors
Back Cover    
Table of Contents 
Sample Chapter 
Figures    
References    
Errata    
Demos     
Talks/Courses 
Software    
Credits    
Purchase online at:

springeronline.com
amazon.com

Click on the image to see a PDF version (for zooming in)

Fig. 10.9. Response to natural images. The top row shows a sample set of photographic images. The corresponding LGN, V1, and FSA responses are displayed as in Figures 10.6 and 10.7. The FSA is indeed activated at the correct location for most faces of the correct size and orientation (e.g. a-d), including 88% of those in the Achermann (1995) database. Just as importantly, the network is not activated for most natural scenes and man-made objects (f-h). In fact, the FSA responded to only 4.3% of 348 presentations of landscapes and other natural scenes from the National Park Service (1995). The spurious activations usually result from a V1 activation similar to that of a three-dot arrangement of contours (d and i), including related patterns such as dog and monkey faces (not shown). Response is low to images where hair or glasses obscure the borders of the eyes, nose, or mouth, and to front-lit downward-looking faces, which have low V1 activation from nose and mouth contours (e). The model predicts that newborns respond in the same way if tested. Credits: (a) copyright 1995 by University of Bern (Achermann 1995), (b-e) public domain; (f-i) copyright 1999-2001 by James A. Bednar. Reprinted from Bednar and Miikkulainen (2003a).