Computational Maps in the Visual Cortex
     Figure 10.16
MiikkulainenBednarChoeSirosh
Home    
About the Authors
Back Cover    
Table of Contents 
Sample Chapter 
Figures    
References    
Errata    
Demos     
Talks/Courses 
Software    
Credits    
Purchase online at:

springeronline.com
amazon.com

Click on the image to see a PDF version (for zooming in)

Fig. 10.16. Postnatal decline in response to schematic images. Before postnatal training, the prenatally trained FSA (row "FSA-0"), responds significantly more to the facelike stimulus (a) than to the three-dot stimulus (b; p = 0.05) or to the scrambled faces (c,d; p < 10-8; Appendix C.2). These responses are similar to those found by Johnson and Morton (1991) in infants up to 1 month of age. In some of their experiments, no significant difference was found between (a) and (b), which is unsurprising given that they are only barely significantly different here. As the FSA neurons learn from real faces postnatally, they respond less and less to schematic faces. The bottom row shows the FSA response after 1000 postnatal iterations. The FSA now rarely responds to (a) and (b), and the average difference between them is no longer significant (p = 0.25). Thus, no preference would be expected for the facelike schematic after postnatal learning, which is exactly what Johnson and Morton (1991) found for older infants, i.e. 6 weeks to 5 months old. The response to real faces also decreases slightly through learning (e,f ), because the newly learned average face and hair outline RFs are a weaker match to any particular face than were the original three-dot RFs. However, this decline is much smaller, because real faces are still more similar to each other than to the schematic faces. Thus, HLISSOM predicts that older infants will still show a face preference if tested with more-realistic stimuli, such as photographs.